While many in the private sector are suffering from actual pay
cuts (I personally know of people who've been forced to take cuts of nearly 50%) and job
losses, public employees may be forced to accept smaller than expected
raises.
A Memorandum of Understanding between the city and the Las Vegas City Employees’ Association, set to be approved at Wednesday’s council meeting, provides for a reduction in the annual cost-of-living, or COLA, raises for city workers by up to 1 percentage point for the next five years, effective in June. Currently, 93 percent of city workers, those represented by a union, receive 3.5 percent COLA raises. Instead, they’ll be getting as little as 2.5 percent, assuming the agreement is ratified. That doesn’t include additional merit and “step” raises — automatic pay hikes built into the salary scales for certain positions — that will be maintained.
Well, maybe.
It also notes that approval of the agreement is conditioned on the city having made “reasonable efforts to negotiate or secure similar or more stringent terms” with the three other employee unions.
[...]
A report recently released by a forensic accountant retained by three of the four unions could complicate matters. The unions had hired Beth Kohn-Cole of Reno to get an independent estimation of the city’s finances before agreeing to reduced raises.
According to the two-page Dec. 26 report, there are “pockets of funds” the city has failed to take into account when claiming its need to cut employee pay hikes.
[...]
Though the Kohn-Cole report didn’t stop the Employees Association from reaching agreement with the city, another union director said he wasn’t yet prepared to sit down with the city.
Thus we have a difference between public and private sectors. People who put their lives on the line to protect us should be well-paid. But government employment should not provide immunity from the economic realities that face everyone else.